The Biafra movement has sparked widespread discussion across various regions, prompting many to question my views on this divisive issue. To me, Biafra symbolizes more than just a quest for territorial independence; it embodies a profound yearning for a reimagined Nigeria. This vision is rooted in principles of equity, fairness, and the rule of law, advocating for a government that is truly responsive to the needs and aspirations of its citizens. A reimagined Nigeria would prioritize merit-based opportunities, ensuring that jobs and political appointments are awarded based on competence rather than nepotism or ethnic affiliation. Additionally, it envisions a decentralized structure, granting the six geopolitical zones the autonomy to develop at their own pace, free from the excessive control of the federal government. Embracing these values—regardless of one’s geographical location—aligns one with the spirit of Biafra.
On the other side of this discussion are those who have been directly affected by the current conditions in Nigeria. Every day, countless individuals endure marginalization, violence, and systemic oppression. Despite their resilience and industriousness, they remain constrained by the structural limitations imposed by the state. The collective frustration and desperation of these individuals have given rise to a growing movement seeking fundamental change—a movement that transcends mere complaints and embodies a resolute demand for a just and autonomous society. If these aspirations remain unattainable within the current Nigerian state, then exploring alternative pathways to self-determination might become necessary. I share this perspective, as it highlights the depth of the grievances many face and the urgent need for meaningful change.
Ultimately, aligning with these principles signifies a Biafran spirit, regardless of one’s geographic origin. Those who bear the brunt of daily injustices—from marginalization to outright violence—face systemic barriers that stifle their progress. Yet, their determination fuels a collective call for lasting solutions. If the ideals of fairness, autonomy, and justice cannot be realized within the current framework, then it may be time to seek a new path. This stance, which I also share, underscores both the severity of their grievances and the undeniable urgency for change.
If so many African countries were not reactive.. they might still be under the colonial rule.
If Mandela and his fellow activists were not reactive, South Africa would still be under appetite.
If Martin Luther Jnr and his fellow black civil rights movement activists were not reactive…civil right in America would not have reach where we are today.
The if’s continues…..
life and death are realities and phases. Fear does not give hope… Sometimes death brings hope to the living… if not I wonder why Christ need to die for Christians to live…
Martin Luther King Jr need to go through that to get black men to this level.
Gandi and Mandela go through tough times for freedom.
To choose to live is to choose to be free. Freedom is not usually given… you work for it.